Received: from mail.webcom.com (mail.webcom.com [206.2.192.68]) by keeper.albany.net (8.7.4/8.7.4-MZ) with ESMTP id NAA18448 for <DWARNER@ALBANY.NET>; Thu, 7 Mar 1996 13:36:19 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost by mail.webcom.com with SMTP
(1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA060363703; Thu, 7 Mar 1996 10:35:03 -0800
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 1996 10:35:03 -0800
Errors-To: dwarner@ALBANY.NET
Message-Id: <313F2AEC.2DB0@indirect.com>
Errors-To: dwarner@ALBANY.NET
Reply-To: lightwave@garcia.com
Originator: lightwave@garcia.com
Sender: lightwave@garcia.com
Precedence: bulk
From: David Barchas <barchas@indirect.com>
To: lightwave@mail.webcom.com
Subject: Re: NT4.0 build 1227 benchmarks
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Status: RO
X-Status:
stuff cut out--->
> > THat is strange. I rendered DOF on my P100 NT 3.51 32megs EDO ram and
> >it took my system only 504 seconds ( 8 minutes 24 seconds).
> >
> > Your system took 9 minutes 57 seconds.
> >
> >Does EDO really increase performance that much??? Perhaps it is worth it
> >after all. Can't wait to try that under 4.0 NT :)
>
> 15% ?? What's the big excitement?
well at 10 minutes per frame for 30 secs of anim = thats 9000 minutes or
6.25 days.......
OR rendered at 15 percent faster---->>> 5.3 days
do lots of 30 second spots and we're talking a lot of wasted time 1 day for each spot.